Forum Acta Plantarum

It is Pilosella subrubens Arv.-Touv. ("glacialis - peleteriana"). Very excellent photos of this rare plant!
G.Gottschlich

Yes, it is H. racemosum (here: subsp. italicum Fr ex Zahn)
G.Gottschlich

It is H. racemosum Waldst. & Kit. ex Willd.
G.Gottschlich

It is Hieracium bifidum Kit. ex Hornem.

It is H. tenuiflorum Arv.-Touv.
G.Gottschlich

It is H. amplexicaule L.
G.Gottschlich

It is Pilosella subrubens Arv.-Touv. (a form with unstriped ligules)
G.Gottschlich

No, it is too much hairy for H. picroides. It is H. cydoniifolium Vill.
G.Gottschlich

Yes, it is H. cydoniifolium Vill.
G.Gottschlich

Yes, it is H. armerioides Arv.-Touv.
G.Gottschlich

It is Pilosella hybrida (cymosa x peleteriana). Gratulation to this very excellent photo, which shows clearly all characters!
G.Gottschlich

Ok, then it is H. burnatii.
G.Gottschlich

Yes, it is H. villosum Jacq.
G.Gottschlich

Yes, it is H. cirritum Arv.-Touv.
G.Gottschlich

Yes, it is H. umbrosum Jord.
G.Gottschlich

Yes, it is H. erioleucum Zahn
G.Gottschlich

Not to decide without knowlegde of the structure of hairs (plumous or not?)
Could be perhaps H. digenum.

It is H. bernardii subsp. gallurense (Arrigioni) Greuter
G.Gottschlich

Seems to belong to H. amplexicaule (glandular hairs on leaf margin?)
G.Gottschlich

It is P. hoppeana ssp. hoppeana
G.Gottschlich

Yes, it is H. lawsonii.
G.Gottschlich

For H. oxyodon it has too much hairs at the capitula.
Seems to be H. burnatii, but it would be necessanry to see the structure
of the hairs (plumous or not?)
G.Gottschlich

Yes, it is Hieracium humile Jacq.
G.Gottschlich

Yes, it is H. rupestre Al..
G.Gottschlich

It is Pilosella piloselloideds (Vill.) Soják
G.Gottschlich

La ricerca ha trovato 416 risultati